Darwin Núñez Under the Microscope in Latest Stat Me Up Liverpool Podcast | OneFootball

Darwin Núñez: Frustrating or Fixable for Liverpool?

Shot Volume Without the Output

In the latest episode of Stat Me Up on Anfield Index, Simon Brundish delivered a detailed analysis of Liverpool’s forward line—and Darwin Núñez didn’t escape scrutiny. The Uruguayan’s raw shot volume still draws attention, but the efficiency behind it is where concerns remain.

“Darwin’s shot volume was like five point four, which is—that’s Mo at his peak,” Brundish revealed, placing Núñez in elite territory in terms of attempts per game. However, he also noted a drop-off: “Darwin’s shot volume has dropped down to two point nine.”

While the attempt rate is promising, the quality and conversion remain an issue. Brundish explained: “If we look at sixty nine percent from Darwin, he’s making it twice as hard to save his shots than Darwin is.” He later added: “Darwin is thirty one percent down.”

Efficiency and Missed Chances

One of the standout metrics was Darwin’s underperformance relative to expected values. “Darwin’s was minus twenty-eight last year,” Brundish stated. While that’s improved—“Darwin’s at minus eleven, which is a big improvement for Darwin”—he remains far from clinical in front of goal.

The missed opportunities still sting. Brundish made it clear: “Darwin missed way too many of those big chances when the game was on the line last season.” For a striker in his prime years, that’s a red flag, particularly in a Liverpool side aiming for consistency and control.

Brundish continued: “Darwin is getting point one XT [expected threat], which is really low.” That stat, measured per 100 touches, places him well behind other forwards in terms of value added during possession phases.

Role in the System and Future Value

There’s also a tactical dimension to consider. Brundish noted a shift last season: “If you remember, Mo dropped his [stats] to fit Darwin in. So Darwin got more shots.” This points to a deliberate structural change to accommodate Núñez—but has it paid off?

It’s a divisive topic. Brundish stated plainly: “People think I’m down on Darwin,” before later adding, “We should sell Darwin in the summer unequivocally because he is not going to get any more valuables.” For him, the logic is financial and strategic: “The smart move is to get rid of him before he finishes his peak… and get rid of Darwin, who is at his peak, because it’s lunacy.”

That said, Brundish acknowledged the potential elsewhere: “Darwin could go to Newcastle and score forty goals.” It’s a reminder that while the talent is undeniable, the fit at Liverpool might be less than ideal.

Conclusion

Darwin Núñez remains one of the most debated figures in Liverpool’s squad. His high shot numbers suggest potential, but efficiency, system fit, and decision-making raise valid concerns. As Liverpool evolve under Arne Slot, Núñez’s future at Anfield may depend more on strategy than sentiment.